Chandigarh – The legal fraternity of the Punjab and Haryana High Court has announced a decision to abstain from work on February 24th, 2025, in a strong display of opposition to the proposed Advocates (Amendment) Act, 2025. This move, decided upon unanimously by the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association’s executive committee, underscores the deep-seated concerns within the legal community regarding the potential impact of the proposed legislation.
The decision to abstain from work signifies a powerful expression of “strong dissatisfaction” with the bill, as articulated by the association’s acting president, Jasdev Singh Brar, and honorary secretary, Swarn Singh Tiwana. The core of the legal professionals concerns, is that certain provisions within the proposed act, have the potential to be significantly detrimental to both the advocates and the integrity of the judicial system.
The proposed Advocates (Amendment) Act, 2025, has been the subject of intense scrutiny since its draft was made public on February 13th for public comment. The BCI has already submitted its objections, highlighting the serious implications that certain provisions could have for the legal profession.
The decision to abstain from work is expected to have a significant impact on the functioning of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. This action will likely lead to:
The legal community hopes that this action will draw the attention of the government and lead to a reconsideration of the proposed amendments.
The BCI’s strong objections to the bill further amplify the concerns of the legal fraternity. The council’s emphasis on the potential erosion of the legal profession’s autonomy underscores the gravity of the situation.
The situation is evolving, and it remains to be seen how the government will respond to the legal community’s concerns. The legal fraternity is closely monitoring the developments and is prepared to take further action if necessary.
This situation also is happening at the same time as the supreme court has raised concerns over the point based system used for the designation of senior advocates. This has caused the Punjab and Haryana high court to defer its scheduled interviews for senior advocate designation. So there is a lot of legal activity happening at this time.
In conclusion, the decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court lawyers to abstain from work on February 24th reflects the deep-seated anxieties within the legal community regarding the proposed Advocates (Amendment) Act, 2025. The situation highlights the importance of safeguarding the autonomy and integrity of the legal profession and the judiciary.