
New Delhi, January 13, 2026: A significant controversy has erupted in Chhattisgarh following the widespread circulation of a viral video depicting a semi-naked dance performance at a private event, where a senior government official was seen showering money. On January 12, 2026, the footage, which allegedly showed a Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) participating in the event and throwing currency notes at the dancers, caused a massive outcry across social media and within local political circles. The explicit nature of the performance and the involvement of a public servant have sparked intense debate and immediate administrative action.
Following the viral spread of the incriminating video, a swift and decisive response was initiated by the Chhattisgarh state government. It was officially announced that the SDM in question, whose identity was quickly confirmed from the footage, has been removed from his post with immediate effect. Furthermore, a high-level probe has been ordered into the entire incident to ascertain the full extent of the official’s involvement and to investigate any potential breaches of conduct rules for government employees.
Also Read: AI-Generated Video Falsely Alleges Anthony Joshua’s Retirement
The video has drawn severe criticism from various sections of society, including women’s rights organizations and civil society groups. It was argued by many that the behavior displayed in the video is unbecoming of a public servant and sends a negative message to the community. The act of showering money on dancers, particularly in a semi-naked performance, has been widely condemned as promoting objectification and potentially unlawful activities. This incident has led to a broader discussion about moral conduct expected from individuals holding positions of public trust.
The controversy has undoubtedly cast a shadow over the local administration and has raised questions about accountability within the public service. It was stated by political analysts that such incidents erode public trust in governance and can lead to a perception of lax oversight. The immediate removal of the SDM, however, has been praised by some as a necessary step to uphold the integrity of the administration and to reassure the public that such behavior will not be tolerated.
As of January 13, 2026, the investigation into the matter is actively underway, with officials collecting further evidence and statements from those involved. It is expected that a detailed report will be submitted to the higher authorities, which will then determine further disciplinary actions against the SDM. This incident serves as a stark reminder to public officials about the constant scrutiny they face in the age of viral media and the critical importance of maintaining professional decorum, both in public and private life.