
New Delhi, March 14, 2026: In a significant legislative move, the Maharashtra government officially tabled the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026 (also known as the Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam) in the state Legislative Assembly on Friday, March 13, 2026.
The bill aims to curb religious conversions carried out through “force, fraud, or allurement” and introduces some of the most stringent penalties seen in the country. With this move, Maharashtra joins at least ten other Indian states that have enacted similar “freedom of religion” laws to regulate the process of faith conversion.
The proposed legislation establishes a rigid administrative framework for anyone wishing to change their faith.
The bill classifies unlawful conversion as a cognizable and non-bailable offense, meaning the police can make arrests without a warrant and bail is not a matter of right.
| Offense Category | Prison Term | Fine |
| General Violations | Up to 7 Years | Up to ₹1 Lakh |
| Vulnerable Groups (Minors, Women, SC/ST) | Up to 7 Years | Up to ₹5 Lakh |
| Mass Conversions (2 or more people) | Up to 7 Years | Up to ₹5 Lakh |
| Repeat Offenders | Up to 10 Years | Up to ₹7 Lakh |
Furthermore, the bill targets organizations involved in facilitating unlawful conversions. If found guilty, the state may cancel the registration of such institutions and withdraw all government financial assistance.
A major focal point of the legislation is the intersection of marriage and religion.
The bill provides an expansive definition of “allurement” or “inducement,” which includes:
The introduction of the bill has sparked intense debate within the state. Proponents, including state ministers, argue the law is a necessary safeguard to protect “gullible persons” and women from “love jihad”—a term used by some to describe alleged campaigns of conversion through marriage.
However, civil rights groups, legal experts, and religious organizations have voiced deep concerns. Critics argue that the 60-day notice period and the “burden of proof” (which lies on the person facilitating the conversion) infringe upon the Fundamental Right to Privacy and the Freedom of Religion guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution.
As the bill moves toward a full debate in the Assembly next week, all eyes are on the judiciary, as several similar laws from other states are currently facing challenges in the Supreme Court.