Tamil Nadu Assembly Passes Resolution Against Centre’s Waqf Amendment Bill, Citing ‘Hurting Muslim Sentiments’

Chennai, Tamil Nadu – The Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly has unanimously passed a resolution opposing the Central government’s proposed amendments to the Waqf Act, 1995, citing concerns that the changes infringe upon the rights of the Muslim community and hurt their religious sentiments. The resolution, moved by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, expressed strong reservations about the proposed alterations, arguing they would significantly undermine the autonomy and administrative control of state Waqf boards.

The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2023, introduced by the Central government, seeks to streamline the administration of Waqf properties and enhance transparency. However, the Tamil Nadu government, along with several other states, has raised objections, claiming that the amendments encroach upon the state’s legislative powers and disrupt the established administrative framework.

Key Points of the Resolution:

• Infringement on State Autonomy: The resolution asserts that the proposed amendments violate the federal structure of the Indian Constitution by transferring powers that traditionally reside with the state Waqf boards to the Central government. It argues that the amendments would allow the Centre to exert undue influence over the management of Waqf properties within Tamil Nadu.
• Concerns Over Tribunal Powers: A significant point of contention is the proposed expansion of the powers of the Waqf Tribunal. The Tamil Nadu government fears that this expansion would diminish the role of state-appointed officials and lead to centralized control, potentially undermining the efficiency and responsiveness of the local administration.
• Protection of Religious Sentiments: The resolution explicitly states that the amendments disregard the religious sentiments of the Muslim community, whose interests are intrinsically linked to the proper administration of Waqf properties. It argues that the changes could lead to mismanagement and misappropriation of these properties, which are often dedicated to charitable and religious purposes.
• Demand for Withdrawal: The Tamil Nadu government has demanded that the Central government withdraw the proposed amendments and engage in consultations with state governments and community representatives to address their concerns.
• Unity within the Assembly: The resolution was passed unanimously, showcasing a rare instance of political consensus on a sensitive issue. All parties present in the assembly, including the opposition AIADMK, supported the resolution, highlighting the widespread concern over the potential implications of the Central government’s proposed changes.

Context and Background:

Waqf properties are religious endowments made by Muslims for charitable, religious, or pious purposes. The Waqf Act, 1995, provides for the better administration of these properties. State Waqf boards are responsible for overseeing the management and utilization of these properties within their respective jurisdictions.

The Central government’s proposed amendments aim to bring greater uniformity and efficiency to the administration of Waqf properties across the country. However, critics argue that these changes are being implemented without adequate consultation with stakeholders and that they disregard the unique socio-cultural context of different states.

Impact and Implications:

The Tamil Nadu government’s resolution is likely to escalate the ongoing debate over the Waqf Amendment Bill. It reflects the growing tension between the Central government and several states over issues of federalism and legislative powers.

The unanimous passage of the resolution underscores the strong opposition to the proposed amendments within Tamil Nadu. It signals the state government’s determination to protect the rights of the Muslim community and safeguard the autonomy of its Waqf board.

The resolution also highlights the sensitivity surrounding the administration of religious properties in India. Any perceived encroachment on the rights of religious minorities can trigger widespread protests and political repercussions.

Future Outlook:

The Central government is yet to respond formally to the Tamil Nadu government’s resolution. However, the strong stance taken by the state assembly is likely to put pressure on the Centre to reconsider its proposed amendments.

It remains to be seen whether the Central government will engage in meaningful consultations with state governments and community representatives to address their concerns. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the administration of Waqf properties and the relationship between the Centre and the states.

The issue also has the potential to become a significant political flashpoint, particularly in the lead-up to future elections. The Tamil Nadu government’s position reflects the broader concerns of many states and religious minorities about the perceived centralization of power under the current Central government.